Legal Opinion · Dissent

A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc. v. Generali - U. S. Branch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1999No. S98G0978Published

1DissentBenham, Chief Justice

Faced with a case of first impression concerning the scope of the conditional exemption contained in OCGA § 40-9-102, the majority concludes that a car rental agency which fulfills its duties under the statute so as to be entitled to the statutory exemption provided therein loses that exemption and must take on the role of insurance guarantor because the purpose behind OCGA § 40-9-102 and the public policy of Georgia require it. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s analysis and the conclusion it reaches. Accordingly, I dissent.

1. OCGA § 40-9-102 provides a mechanism by which the owner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Jones v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Select Insurance v. RegisterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API