Koenig v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Spence William Koenig appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision suspending his driving privileges for ninety-one days. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] This appeal was submitted on essentially undisputed facts as found by the hearing officer. On January 16, 2011, Trooper Jeremy Rost pulled over Koenig’s vehicle for speeding and expired tabs. Koenig exhibited signs of intoxication. Koenig agreed to perform field sobriety tests, passing the alphabet test and failing the remaining tests. At 12:47 a.m., Trooper…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Lange v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Luebke v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Tony Gene LukinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Gardner v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Judicial Conduct Commission v. HagarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Iowa v. Tony Gene LukinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.