Legal Opinion

(PC) Kessler v. Ierokormos

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 23, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01738Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY W. KESSLER, No. 2:19-cv-01738 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ALEXANDER IEROKORMOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Wesley W. Kessler, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on plaintiff’s First Amended 19 Complaint (FAC), as screened by the court, filed February 20, 2020. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff 20 asserts a claim against defendant, Alexander Ierokormos, under the Eighth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API