Legal Opinion

In THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2010No. 27945Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO, Union-Appellee,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY (Griev. of Scot Ouchi); ES-04-07; 2006-002, Employer-Appellant.

No. 27945.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

February 25, 2010.

On the briefs:

Paul K.W. Au, Deputy Corporation Counsel, City & County of Honolulu, for Employer-Appellant.

Herbert R. Takahashi and Rebecca L. Covert (Takahashi Vasconcellos & Associate Judge Covert) for Union-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NAKAMURA, C.J., FOLEY and LEONARD, JJ.

Employer-Appellant City and County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council, Afl-Cio, and C. L. Williams v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Tatibouet v. EllsworthHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Inlandboatmen's Union v. Sause Bros., Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Labrador v. Liberty Mutual GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. Dawson International, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API