Legal Opinion
Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Centennial Liquor Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1951No. 13079PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit for alleged infringement of United States Letters Patents Nos. 2,-417,383, 2,417,384 and 2,475,529, all relating to a novel color phenomenon termed daylight fluorescence. The court below found all three patents to be valid and infringed by daylight fluorescent signs and sign fabrics made, used, or sold by all of the defendants and no appeal is taken from that part of the judgment. But the trial court disallowed damages for such infringement and it is from this part of the judgment that plaintiff has appealed.
The first and second numbered patents in suit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Livesay Industries, Inc. v. Livesay Window Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. James P. Byrne, D.B.A. Byrne Wallpaper & Paint StoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Bros, Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Bros, Incorporated v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Company, and William E. Grace, W. E. Grace Manufacturing Company, and William E. Grace v. Bros, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.