Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2006No. 04-2437UnpublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Agnes I. Swartz, is a 66-year old woman with significant physical and mental impairments. The present appeal concerns her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits for the period from September 1992, when she was last employed, through December 31, 1997, when her “insured status” expired. 1 An administrative law judge ruled that she was not entitled to any benefits because during that time she had the “residual functional capacity” to perform a significant number of jobs in the national economy. For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Jerome MAZIARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. John F. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jackson Ex Rel. K.J. v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
  2. Baker v. Social Security Administration CommissionerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2017
  3. Boruff v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Flory v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Gibbs v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API