Legal Opinion
Flory v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00130Unknown
1Opinion
UNSOITUETDH SETRANT DESIS DTIRSITCRTI COTF COOHUIOR T WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON SHARYTA J. FLORY, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-130 vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) REVERSING THE ALJ’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING AS UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE; (2) REMANDING THIS CASE UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- David Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Danny L. KEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.