Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided September 1, 2022No. 8:22-cv-00011Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TAYLOR BISHOP, Plaintiff, 8:22CV11 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS BY AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY Defendants. DEFENDANT AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION In this case, plaintiff Taylor Bishop has brought products liability claims against defendant Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., an India-based manufacturer of Metformin Hydrochloride Extended Release Tablets, 500 mg…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API