Legal Opinion
State v. Collymore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 2020No. SC19868PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY COLLYMORE (SC 19868) Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Kahn, Ecker and Vertefeuille, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to State v. Dickson ( 322 Conn. 410), in cases in which the state seeks to present an in-court identification that has not been preceded by a successful identification during a nonsuggestive identification pro- cedure, the state must request permission to do so, and the trial court may grant such permission only if it determines that there is no factual dispute as to the identity of the perpetrator or that the ability of the eyewitness to identify the defendant…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Ivory W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022