Legal Opinion
Ferenczi v. National Sulphur Co.
Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J.
Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ackerson, C. C. J.
The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant entered into a certain agreement on January 18th, 1932, as evidenced by an exchange of letters (three in number), which are incorporated in the pleading by reference, from which the defendant agreed to hire the trucking service of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff agreed to furnish such service to certain specified points at agreed rates for a period of one year, for the transportation of all of the material of the defendant to the said points of destination for said period. It is further alleged that the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Atlantic Pebble Co. v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Baker v. Murray Tool & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- East v. Cayuga Lake Ice LineNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jenkins v. the City Ice and Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Laveson v. Warner Mfg. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953