Legal Opinion

Freeman v. J.I.H. Investments, LP

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 4, 2015No. Appellate Case 2014-000642; 27586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Julie Freeman, individually and on behalf of 5,314 similarly situated car buyers, filed a lawsuit against J.L.H. Investments, *368LP, a/k/a Hendrick Honda of Easley (“Hendrick”), seeking damages under the South Carolina Dealers Act1 (the “Dealers Act”) on the ground that Hendrick “unfairly” and “arbitrarily” charged all of its customers “closing fees”2 that were not calculated to reimburse Hendrick for actual closing costs. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Freeman in the amount of $1,445,786.00 actual damages. In post-trial rulings, the trial judge: (1) denied Hendrick’s motions to overturn…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fullbright v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Harris v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  3. SC Department of Consumer Affairs v. Cash CentralCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API