Legal Opinion

von Engelbrechten v. Galvanoni & Nevy Bros.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 18, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin B. Stecher, J.

After a trial of this action, without a jury, I previously held (59 Misc 2d 721) that the plaintiff was entitled to a money judgment on an award made by the Hamburg (Germany) Amicable Court of Arbitration.

The defendant now moves to vacate that determination and asks for judgment dismissing the complaint or, alternatively, an order directing a new trial (CPLR 4404, subd. [b]). The sole basis of the motion is defendant’s claim that the action was Dime-barred, more than one year having elapsed between the making of the award in Germany and the service of the summons here (CPLR 215, subd. 5).

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nehasane Park Assn. v. . LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. von Engelbrechten v. Galvanoni & Nevy Bros.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969
  3. Claim of Weil v. Estate of RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Marriage of FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API