Legal Opinion

Codo, Bonds, Zumstein & Konzelman, P.C. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 24, 1986No. 3—86—0036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The defendant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), appeals from an order of the trial court granting a partial summary judgment, awarding fees, and enforcing an attorney’s lien for the plaintiffs, Codo, Bonds, Zumstein & Konzelman, P.C. (the law firm). The FDIC argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enforce the attorney’s lien and that the court erred in granting the law firm’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

In January of 1979 Alex J. Waitkoss (Waitkoss), an Illinois resident, executed two promissory notes for a total of $135,000, in favor of the Elgin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Champagnie v. WE O'Neil Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Clubb v. ClubbIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cotton v. First State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Schoeberlein v. Purdue UniversityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. In re Parentage of A.H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API