Codo, Bonds, Zumstein & Konzelman, P.C. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The defendant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), appeals from an order of the trial court granting a partial summary judgment, awarding fees, and enforcing an attorney’s lien for the plaintiffs, Codo, Bonds, Zumstein & Konzelman, P.C. (the law firm). The FDIC argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enforce the attorney’s lien and that the court erred in granting the law firm’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
In January of 1979 Alex J. Waitkoss (Waitkoss), an Illinois resident, executed two promissory notes for a total of $135,000, in favor of the Elgin…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Champagnie v. WE O'Neil Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Clubb v. ClubbIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cotton v. First State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Schoeberlein v. Purdue UniversityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- In re Parentage of A.H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017