Lehto v. Atlantic Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ontonagon; Cooper, J. Case by Toivo Lehto, by next friend, against the Atlantic Mining Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Plaintiff, a boy 15 years old, was employed by defendant to perform certain duties connected with the operation of what are designated in the record “roughing machines,” which perform the operation of separating copper and rough sand. Defendant had a number of these machines and on the same floor with *414them a “grinder” run by a 12-inch belt passing from an elevated line shaft to and over a 36-inch pulley, running by the side of the grinder and close to the floor of the room. By the side of this pulley was an “idler,” or loose pulley, to which it was customary to shift the belt when it was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- McDonald v. Champion Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Allen v. JakelMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- King v. Ford River Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Pearce v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neil v. West Virginia Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hosking v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910