Legal Opinion

Knutson v. Ekren

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1942No. File No. 6843PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, Ch. J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover on fifteen causes of action. Thirteen of these are predicated upon promissory notes. The fourteenth is based upon the payment of real estate taxes; and the fifteenth is a claim for gasoline and oils furnished to the defendant.

As one of the defenses, defendant alleged that all of the issues involved were fully heard and determined in a former action; that judgment was rendered in defendant’s favor; and the judgment has never been set aside, modified, or revised.

A jury was impanelled, and after both sides rested defendant moved to dismiss the action. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Bleakley v. BarclaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Farmers State Bank v. AntonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dolajak v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Robert E. Hanson v. Hunt Oil Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Progressive Contractors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Farmers State Bank v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API