Legal Opinion

Constantino v. Borough of Forest Hills

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1180 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Abraham and Rose Constantino (Appellants) appeal a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) which affirmed the denial of a variance to Appellants by the Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Forest Hills (Board). For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

As the trial court took no additional evidence, we must determine whether the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence, and whether the Board abused its discretion or committed an error of law. Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In re Appeal of HaffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. JALC Real Estate Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Harbucks Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Borough of Industry v. Allegheny Valley School, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1985
  5. Constantino v. Borough of Forest HillsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API