Legal Opinion

R. L. Harris, Inc. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

delivered the opinion of the Court.. According to the allegations of the bill, accepted here as facts, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Bailway Company contracted with a co-defendant for extensive improvements, additions, etc., to its railroad property in Hamilton County known as Citico Yard. The complainants seek the enforcement of a lien against this railroad property under the provisions of Code Section 8002 for the satisfaction of indebtedness of a sub-contractor incurred in (1) rental of heavy earth moving equipment used in the making of these improvements, etc., and (2) for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. Knoxville, La Follette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hamblen Motor Co. v. Miller & HarleTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Nicks v. Baird Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giles & Ransome, Inc. v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Lembke Construction Co. v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bush Construction MacHinery, Inc. v. Kansas City Factory Outlets, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Logan Equipment Corp. v. Profile Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  5. Southeastern Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Inco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API