Legal Opinion

Yellow Hammer Gas & Oil Co. v. Carlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1897No. 17,995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the IVells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This was an action in ejectment and to quiet title. The only assignment of error is in the action of the lower court in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new7 trial, and the only question discussed by the appellant depends upon the evidence. The appellees insist that the evidence is not properly in the record, and that, therefore, the question so discussed is not before us.

*69The transcript contains what purports to be the original longhand manuscript of the evidence. An order book entry discloses the filing on February 10, 1896, of the longhand manuscript and the bill of exceptions,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Mason v. BrodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. City of Decatur v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Taylor v. RegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Cooper v. BartlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pullen v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API