Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Buescher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2010No. 08-1389, 08-1415PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

There is nothing novel about requiring election campaign committees in this country to file periodic reports, including disclosures of names of contributors and the amount contributed. Many judicial decisions have considered whether particular reporting and disclosure requirements can withstand scrutiny under the First Amendment. The great bulk of those decisions, however, concern committees that are working for or against candidates for public office. Reporting requirements are justified as necessary to police whether anyone is contributing more than allowed to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Center for Individual Freedom v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Family Pac v. Rob McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Gordon Justice, Jr. v. Delbert Hosemann, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Gessler v. Colorado Common CauseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. Andrew Nathan Worley v. Florida Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API