Legal Opinion

State v. York

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 31, 1977No. 59461PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Defendant appeals his conviction of delivery of a schedule I controlled substance (LSD) in violation of § 204.401(1), The Code. We find his six assignments of error to be without merit and accordingly affirm the trial court.

The evidence taken in the light most consistent with the verdict shows the following. On March 19,1975 Roger Timko (Tim-ko), special agent with the Iowa division of narcotic and drug enforcement met Everett Hadley ("Hadley) through an introduction by a confidential informant. Timko told Had-ley he was interested in purchasing 1000 “hits” of LSD. Hadley, who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. State v. LamarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. State v. OggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AldapeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. RichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. State v. SchrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. State v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API