Legal Opinion

State v. Ogg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 1976No. 58588PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeGRAND, Justice.

This appeal presents two evidentiary questions which arose during defendant’s trial for possession of a controlled sub*621stance. We reverse on one; and since we remand for further proceedings, we resolve the other for the guidance of the trial court and counsel in the event of another trial.

The information charged defendant with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. § 204.401(1), The Code. The contraband in question consisted of 46 LSD tablets.

I. Defendant claims it was error to permit a police officer to testify the amount of LSD in defendant’s possession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. State v. DrosteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. State v. TrudoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. In Re Detention of PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API