Legal Opinion

Toppi v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1971No. Civ. A. 42034PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq. (1965), alleging numerous theories as the basis for the cause of action. In May of 1971 this Court denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment holding that the facts as alleged by the plaintiff could establish a cause of action. Toppi v. United States, 327 F.Supp. 1277 (E.D.Pa.1971). The case was tried without a jury on the question of liability. The testimony was conflicting on practically every point except the fact that plaintiff was injured…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. United States v. Delora Huff Page, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Stanley James Pageand Jenny Lynn Page, MinorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Toppi v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. William Merklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975
  5. Suchomajcz v. Hummel Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API