Legal Opinion

William Merklin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 14, 1986No. 85-5079PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

Appellant William Merklin filed this action under the Federal Torts Claims Act (“FTCA” or “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (1982), seeking compensation for the injuries he allegedly sustained as a result of his work with radioactive materials in a plant retained and regulated by the Atomic Energy Commission (“AEC”). Because we hold that the district court prematurely granted judgment in favor of the United States on one of Merklin’s claims, we reverse and remand.

I

Between 1953-59 and 1962-71, Merklin was employed by Rare Earths, Inc.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Irene H. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Lawrence Bushman and Gwenyth Bushman v. Henry J. Halm and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. K.W. Thompson Tool Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Dube v. Pittsburgh CorningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API