Legal Opinion

Magic Petroleum Corporation v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (069083)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 28, 2014No. A-46-12PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fernandez-Vina

When environmental contamination occurs, the Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act), N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.24, makes all dischargers jointly and severally liable for the entire cost of cleanup. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP or Department) is involved in a spill cleanup either by affirmatively compelling a “discharger” to remediate the site or by managing remediation accomplished by parties. Remediation expenses are the responsibility of the party or parties who are “in any way responsible” for the pollution. N.J.S.A 58:10-23.11g. The Spill Act…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Daaleman v. Elizabethtown Gas CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Sattelberger v. TelepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Young v. LattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. New Jersey Civil Service Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. Morristown Associates v. Grant Oil Company (073248)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Greg and Renee Matejek v. Martha and Guy WatsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  5. 89 WATER STREET ASSOCIATES VS. JOHN H. REILLY, III (C-000003-15, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API