Legal Opinion
Willoughby v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 25, 1994No. Civ. A. PJM 94-214PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
The present case is particularly appropriate for transfer to another United States District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Accordingly, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion to Transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
The Court explains.
I
Plaintiff THEODORE ROBERT WIL-LOUGHBY (“Willoughby”) has sued Defendant POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (“Pepeo”) for breach of contract, fraud, and negligence in connection with his termination of employment with Pepeo. The suit, originally filed in the Circuit Court for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Central of Georgia Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Suburban O'Hare Commission v. DoleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vasconcellos v. Cybex International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- McMahon Books, Inc. v. New Castle Associates (In Re McMahon Books, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994
- Koehler v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005