Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1987No. D84-1296; CA A41627Published

1Per curiam

Husband appeals from a judgment holding him in contempt for his wilful failure to pay child support. We reverse, because the trial court refused to hear his evidence.

Husband appeared pro se at the contempt hearing.1 Wife called husband and herself as witnesses. After both had testified, wife rested her case. Without inquiring whether husband had any evidence to present, the trial court asked questions of wife’s attorney regarding the procedural background of the case and wife’s legal theories and allowed wife’s attorney to argue the case. After wife’s attorney had made his argument, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hathaway v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Hathaway v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API