Legal Opinion

United States v. Linda Kay Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1993No. 92-50482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After a trial by jury, appellant Linda Kay Richardson was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements to the Department of Labor in order to obtain disability benefits under the Federal Employees Compensation Act (“FECA”). Richardson challenges her conviction on the ground that section 1001, the general federal false-statement statute, is limited by 18 U.S.C. § 1920, a specific false-statement statute applicable exclusively to federal employees’ compensation affidavits, reports, or claims. Because we conclude that the scope of section 1001 is limited by section 1920, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Don Bruce DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Robert G. Bedore, A/K/A BedordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Lawrence Joseph MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TomenyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Jesse BentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Susan Carol FITZGERALD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API