Legal Opinion

United States v. Work

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 3, 2005No. 04-2172PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, defendant-appellant Timothy P. Work argues that the Sixth Amendment, as interpreted in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), applies to the revocation of supervised release and the consequent imposition of additional prison time. He posits that when such a revocation leads to additional imprisonment above and beyond the top of the original guideline sentencing range, the facts underlying the revocation must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude that the appellant’s argument is doubly flawed: it is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Pepper Sue HinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Rasheim CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. RondeauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API