Redmond v. . Staton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, tried before Armfield, J., at Fall Term of Edgecombe Superior Court. There was judgment for the defendant and plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Funches.
1Opinion of the Court
Fuboíiés, J.:
At April Term, 1886, of Edgecombe Superior Court, 0. IT. Farrar recovered a judgement against B. Bryan and Joshua Killebrew, which was duly placed on the Judgment Docket of said court but was not indexed and cross-indexed as required by law, to constitute it a lien on the land of the defendent Killebrew in Edgecombe County.
Farrar, soon thereafter, sold and assigned said judgment to the plaintiff who did not know of tbe defective condition of the index.' Efillebrew, at the date of this judgment and at the date of the assignment to plaintiff, was the owner of sufficient real estate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dewey v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Holman v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State Ex Rel. Kivett v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Timberlake v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Commonwealth v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Bank v. . School CommitteeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Jones v. . Franklin EstateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hahn v. . MoselySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.