Legal Opinion

Automaker, Inc. v. CCRT Co., Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 21, 1998No. 01-95-00893-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.

We consider whether a nonmovant for summary judgment can amend its pleadings after the trial court has rendered a final summary judgment. We conclude it cannot.

Facts

Appellants Automaker, Inc. and U.S. Modular, Inc. sued appellees USA Factors and Financial Services Company, C.C.R.T. Company, Ltd., 1911 Financial Services, Inc., Howard B. Chapman, Glen C. Runnels, Richard B. Tribe, and Richard B. Cole in Fort Bend County over a financial agreement between the parties. The parties eventually settled this initial lawsuit. Automaker, U.S. Modular, and appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hussong v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Perez v. Briercroft Service Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Leinen v. Buffington's Bayou City Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Merckling v. Curtis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. LaFlamme, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Rivera v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Denman v. Citgo Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Prater v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  5. Mensa-Wilmot v. Smith International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API