Legal Opinion

Illinois Central R. R. v. Ball

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 13, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeals from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller —

Reversing.

These two actions for personal injuries, arose out of the same accident; and, having been consolidated, they were tried together by a single jury. The controlling facts are as follows:

On August 12, 1911, the appellee, Mrs. Lou Ball, and her infant daughter, Beulah Ball, a child about three years of age, traveled upon appellant’s train from Central City to Hillside. In her petition she charged that after the passengers for Central City had alighted from the car, she went aboard of said train for passage to Hillside, and while on the front platform…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lexington Ry. Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Louisville Railway Co. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Bennett v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blume v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Samuels v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Dudley v. Blue Ribbon Line CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. HeinrichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API