Legal Opinion

State v. Davilla

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. 92-4; CA A74228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion. 121 Or App 583, 855 P2d 1160 (1993). Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to murder, burglary in the first degree and attempted rape in the first degree. We held that, under ORS 138.222(2)(d) and State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), his claimed errors regarding sentencing could not be reviewed. Defendant argues that we erred, because “implicit in this rule of preclusion is the assumption that the sentence for which review is precluded is a ‘sentencing guidelines’ sentence.” He argues that the court here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Along Came Trudy LLC v. OLCCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API