Quincy Jejuan Neelys v. State

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Quincy Jean Neelys appeals his convictions for robbery and aggravated assault. In appealing his conviction for robbery, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and asserts he was entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense of theft. In appealing the conviction for aggravated assault, appellant asserts the trial court erred in cumulating his sentences for both the aggravated assault and robbery convictions, resulting in double jeop ardy. Appellant also asserts error in the admission of certain…