Legal Opinion

Crail v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1926No. 7146PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff was a wholesale and retail dealer in fuel in Minneapolis, Minn., where he had a coal yard for the delivery of coal to him in that city. The defendant was a common carrier. A carload containing 88,700 pounds of coal was delivered to it, the initial earrier, at Royalton, Ill., for transportation under a uniform bill of lading to Minneapolis, Minn. During its transportation the plaintiff bought the bill of lading and became the owner of the coal. The defendant caused it to be delivered at its destination in the plaintiff’s yard in Minneapolis, less 5,500…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Marsh v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Harvey v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The H. Rouw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. W. A. Hover & Co. v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. United States v. Palmer & Parker Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  4. Illinois Cent. R. v. CrailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Crail v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API