Legal Opinion

Goncalves v. NMU Pension Trust

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 14, 2003No. 2002-10-AppealPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case concerns the calculation of a retired employee’s benefits under a pension plan governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The plaintiff, Domingo Goncalves, appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, NMU Pension Trust. The plaintiff contends that a Superior Court motion justice erred in granting summary judgment because the issue of whether the plan’s trustees reasonably interpreted the pension plan presented a disputed question of material fact. Because Goncalves’s action fell under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), state…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Michael F. Terry v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Christine M. Donato v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Richard P. Sullivan v. Coventry Municipal Employees' Retirement PlanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  2. Aubin v. GiffordSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Blinn v. City of East ProvidenceSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Corbin v. Dept. of Human Serv.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  5. Duffy v. Town of West WarwickSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API