Legal Opinion
Gapay v. Q & S ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided May 10, 2000No. A99-0415-CV (HRH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLLAND, District Judge.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendant Q & S Enterprises, Inc., moves for summary judgment against plaintiff. 1 The motion is opposed. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment against defendant on the issue of unseaworthiness. 2 The motion is opposed. Oral argument has not been requested.
FACTS
Plaintiff is Hugh Gapay, a Jones Act seaman injured while employed aboard the fishing vessel F/V Exito. Plaintiff brings his admiralty and maritime claim against his employer, Q & S Enterprises, Inc., in personam, ■…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Admiral Towing Company, a Corporation and Walter B. Martinson v. Theo Woolen and Dorothy E. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barlas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003