United States v. Jamar Quarles
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Jamar Quarles appeals his sentence, including the district court’s determination that Michigan’s crime of third-degree home invasion is equivalent to generic burglary, thus constituting a predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). Specifically, he argues that the Michigan statute: (1) includes locations that are broader than generic burglary and (2) does not properly have an intent-upon-entry element that is required under • generic burglary. If Quarles succeeds on his challenge, he also challenges a three-point increase in criminal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Quarles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. Jesus Islas-SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. TurrietaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- JASSO ARANGUREBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Monquel PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.