Legal Opinion

United States v. Jamar Quarles

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2017No. 16-1690PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Jamar Quarles appeals his sentence, including the district court’s determination that Michigan’s crime of third-degree home invasion is equivalent to generic burglary, thus constituting a predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). Specifically, he argues that the Michigan statute: (1) includes locations that are broader than generic burglary and (2) does not properly have an intent-upon-entry element that is required under • generic burglary. If Quarles succeeds on his challenge, he also challenges a three-point increase in criminal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Quarles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. Jesus Islas-SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. TurrietaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. JASSO ARANGUREBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  5. United States v. Monquel PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API