State ex rel. National Bank v. Boyd
Supreme Court of South Carolina
In this case the Hon. T. B. Fraser, of the Third Circuit, and Hon. James Aldrich, of the Second Circuit, sat in the places of Mr. Justice McGowan, who was disqualified by interest, and Mr. Justice Pope, who, as attorney general, had been counsel in the matter.
Read the full summary
In this case the Hon. T. B. Fraser, of the Third Circuit, and Hon. James Aldrich, of the Second Circuit, sat in the places of Mr. Justice McGowan, who was disqualified by interest, and Mr. Justice Pope, who, as attorney general, had been counsel in the matter. It was an original application to this court, commenced by the filing of a petition which set forth substantially the same facts as were stated in the petition in the Cromer case, and the following additional allegations : XII. That thereafter, to wit, on the sixteenth day of November, 1891. your petitioner petitioned the Court of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This case, an original application to the Supreme Court, and the case of the State of South Carolina ex relatione the National Bank of Newberry, South Carolina, v. Wallace C. Cromer, as county auditor of Newberry County, petition for mandamus, being an appeal from the judgment and order of his honor, Judge Hudson, on Circuit, were heard together in this court. These cases grow out of the same matter and involve a discussion of the same principles. The second case is against the auditor, while this one is against the treasurer; and it…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Johnston v. Prince, Co. Treas.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Ex parte ChamberlainU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1893
- Hutchison v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Breedin v. Town of ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932