Legal Opinion

Thornberry Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 17, 1978No. 271-75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Harry E. Wood, filed April 7, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the decision as the basis for its judgment in this case**. Accordingly, it is concluded that plaintiff is entitled to recover and judgment is entered for plaintiff with the amount thereof to be determined in further…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. International Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Missouri Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API