Swank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
These three tax refund suits, consolidated for argument, all present the single question of whether a provision in a coal-mining lease permitting termination by either party (or by the lessor alone) on 30 days’ notice precludes the plaintiff-lessees from having an "economic interest” in the coal in place which would entitle them to a percentage allowance for depletion under sections 611 and 613 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The Government admits that, in the absence of this 30-day termination provision, the lessees would all be entitled to such a depletion allowance.1
Though they all…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. James C. And Helen M. Stallard, and Dewey H. And Geneva StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ridder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Berkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United States v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.