Legal Opinion

Swank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 18, 1979No. 403-75; No. 49-77; No. 400-77PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

These three tax refund suits, consolidated for argument, all present the single question of whether a provision in a coal-mining lease permitting termination by either party (or by the lessor alone) on 30 days’ notice precludes the plaintiff-lessees from having an "economic interest” in the coal in place which would entitle them to a percentage allowance for depletion under sections 611 and 613 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The Government admits that, in the absence of this 30-day termination provision, the lessees would all be entitled to such a depletion allowance.1

Though they all…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. James C. And Helen M. Stallard, and Dewey H. And Geneva StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ridder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Berkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. United States v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API