People v. Thornburgh
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery, and the ease is before this court on his appeal from an order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment.
The point was made, both upon demurrer and upon motion in arrest of judgment, that the information does not charge a public offense, and this is now the principal point relied upon for a reversal of the judgment.
The information charges that defendant “did then and there willfully, unlawfully, feloniously and fraudulently, and with intent then and there to damage, prejudice and defraud one Ignatz Beck, make and forge a certain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Commonwealth v. DallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ex Parte SolwayMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. LuizziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.