Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re Kahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 1972Published
1Dissent
Murphy, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and would grant respondent’s motion to confirm the report of the Referee. The majority in its opinion has set forth the facts relative to the instant disciplinary proceeding.
Hon. George Trosk, the learned Referee who heard this matter,, in his report stated:
“ Thus, the question is: do we accept the testimony of the Hedges or do we accept the testimony of respondent.
“ In my opinion, to state the question is to answer it.
“ I venture to say that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to find anywhere in the annals of the law, another case in *125which a witness…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- United States v. John A. McGuire Edmond G. Blumner and Herbert PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.