Legal Opinion

Benz v. New York State Thruway Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1961PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

The courts below, bound as they were by Easley v. New York State Thruway Auth. (1 N Y 2d 374), correctly held that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of this equity suit (or of the equity suit of Mathewson v. New York State Thruway Auth., 9 N Y 2d 788, decided herewith). Easley held that the Thruway Authority “ is an arm or agency of the State ” (p. 376) and that “ the Legislature could in creating the Thruway Authority have refused to waive immunity as to it and thus could have forbidden suits to be maintained against the Authority in any court or tribunal ” (pp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Glassman v. GlassmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Breen v. Mortgage CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Strang v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zeidner v. WulforstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
  2. Long Island Rail Road v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Interstate Wrecking Co. v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. State v. Farragut Nursing HomeNew York Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API