Legal Opinion

Constance v. State, Through DOTD

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 24, 1993No. 93-CA-0813PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

626 So.2d 1151 (1993)

Carroll LeBlanc, Wife of/and Gerald CONSTANCE and Cleary Bicycle, Moped & Go-Cart Center, Inc.,

v.

STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF HIGHWAYS, Pepper & Associates, Inc., T.L. James and Company, C.A. and Louisiana Paving, Inc.

No. 93-CA-0813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 28, 1993.

Concurring Opinion November 24, 1993.

Rehearing Denied January 6, 1994.

Jesse S. Guillot, New Orleans and Ronald J. Bertrand, Rayne, for applicant.

Jerome M. Volk, Jr. and Mark J. Armato, DeMartini, LeBlanc, D'Aquila & Volk, Kenner, for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Reymond v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  4. State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. STATE, DOTD v. DietrichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Avenal v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Arnold v. Town of BallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. STATE, DOTD v. McMillion Dozer ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Ardoin v. State, Dept. of Transp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Tournillon v. Sewerage and Water Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API