Legal Opinion

Avenal v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 19, 2004No. 2003-C-3521PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

886 So.2d 1085 (2004)

Albert J. AVENAL, Jr., et al.

v.

The STATE of Louisiana and The Department of Natural Resources.

No. 2003-C-3521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 19, 2004.

Rehearing Denied December 10, 2004.

Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, Burke & Mayer, Andrew C. Wilson, David L. Carrigee, Jedd S. Malish, Special Assistants to Attorney General, Counsel for Applicant.

St. Martin & Williams, Michael X. St. Martin, Joseph G. Jevic, III, Houma, Gauthier, Downing, Labarre, Dean & Sulzer, Charles S. Labarre, Cossich, Belle Chasse, Sumich & Parsiola, Ltd., Philip F. Cossich, Jr., McNabb &…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Johnson; Concurrence · Weimer.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish GovernmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. TERREBONNE SCHOOL BD. v. Castex EnergySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  4. In Re SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Slack v. StreamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API