Legal Opinion

Haft v. Eastland Financial Corp.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided January 18, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-0302PPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETTINE, Senior District Judge.

This case is representative of a number of cases that have recently been brought against financial institutions in the wake of the downturn in this region’s economy. The story is a familiar one in securities litigation. DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624, 617 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 347, 112 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990). “At one time the firm bathes itself in a favorable light. Later the firm discloses that things are less rosy. The plaintiff contends that the difference must be attributable to fraud.” Id. In the instant case,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re First Chicago Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Ferber v. Travelers Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API