Legal Opinion

Barrie v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2005No. 02-CF-319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, he claims that there was not probable cause to conduct the warrantless search and seizure that preceded his arrest, and therefore the evidence obtained from that allegedly unconstitutional search should be suppressed. We affirm.

Following his indictment on the charge of Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine, the appellant filed a motion seeking to suppress the evidence supporting the government’s case. The sole witness at the suppression hearing was Park Police Officer Kurt Hansen. His…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Parsons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Cunningham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API