Legal Opinion

Porter v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2010No. 09-CM-1275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

Appellant Porter was convicted of possession of cocaine. On appeal from his conviction, he contends that his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because a tip given by a known police informant was not sufficiently reliable to give the police probable cause to search him. In addition, he argues that the trial court erred in its handling of background information relating to the informant, asserting that his rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and the Sixth Amendment were violated. We reject all of these…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Kelby R. Gordon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Parsons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Lamont A. Biles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Timms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API