Van Sickle v. Stroud
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANGDON, Justice.
This suit is in the nature of a will contest, i.e., the contest of the probate of an alleged codicil to the will of Mrs. Fanny M. Manners, whose will had previously been admitted to probate. Application to probate the codicil was refused in the Pro bate Court. On appeal to the District Court a jury requested by the proponent of the codicil was duly empaneled for trial. When the proponent concluded the presentation of his evidence the contestant moved for a directed verdict. The trial judge in granting the motion withdrew the case from the jury and rendered judgment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Brawley v. BowenTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Conwill v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- In re HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Wilborn v. GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Arvedson v. LubyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.