Legal Opinion

Van Sickle v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1971No. 17220PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANGDON, Justice.

This suit is in the nature of a will contest, i.e., the contest of the probate of an alleged codicil to the will of Mrs. Fanny M. Manners, whose will had previously been admitted to probate. Application to probate the codicil was refused in the Pro bate Court. On appeal to the District Court a jury requested by the proponent of the codicil was duly empaneled for trial. When the proponent concluded the presentation of his evidence the contestant moved for a directed verdict. The trial judge in granting the motion withdrew the case from the jury and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Brawley v. BowenTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Conwill v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In re HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Wilborn v. GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  5. Arvedson v. LubyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API