Parwal Inv. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action of escheat by the State against 'the Parwal Investment Company anid others. Judgment for the State, and defendants bring error
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
This action was brought by the state, in 'the district court of Mayes county, to escheat certain lands in that county, record title -of wihich Was beld by the Parwal Investment Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Missouri. Judgment was rendered for the state.
The action was instituted under section 2, c. 32, Sess. Laws 1907-08 (section 8437, Rev. Laws 1910, by which the Legislature sought to provide 'the procedure in actions of es-cheat .of land -held by corporations in violation of section 2, art. 22, of the Constitution (section 349, Wms. Anno.) This section of the statute…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Louisville School Board v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- State v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. State Ex Rel. VassarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Hudson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Texas Co. v. State ex rel. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.